Comments on: Carla’s CSK Choices

By: Paula

Paula — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:01:49 +0000

Don, I agree that there aren’t “that many” in the candidate pool. But the fact remains that there are plenty more beyond the usual winners (with respect). I believe that publishers must submit to be considered for CSK, but I’m not clear if the committee already has books in mind before they receive them. I’m sure the process has something to do with why the same winners are often chosen.

Another thought – if it’s based on submissions, some publishers/authors may simply not want to throw their hat in the ring if their book does not fit the usual profile. And I say that’s a mistake. Submit and let the chips fall where they may. Make the committee aware of the variety and soon they’re selections will reflect that.

By: Carla Sarratt

Carla Sarratt — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:23:11 +0000

Having spent the week researching authors for CSK as well as 28 Days Later, I am excited to see what Monday brings. There is such a wide range of unlauded talent in our ranks with books and authors that are flying under our radar.

Even if our predictions are off, I hope that our predictions reach ALA’s eyes and ears for next year’s CSK.

Paula, it’s easy to gamble with no money, LOL!

By: Don

Don — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:12:25 +0000

Ok, now I am seriously anticipating the winners on Monday. It would be so refreshing if some new people were honored, but I’m not feeling hopeful. Not entirely the fault of the CSK committee, I mean there has to be more AA talent step to the stage so there’d be a larger pool to choose from. I don’t have an exact number, but with illustrators, there’s probably no more than 10, maybe 20 (and that’s really, really stretching it) to choose from in one year. Am I wrong?

By: Paula

Paula — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:43:27 +0000

::clap, clap, clap:: Carla, great predictions.

Remind me to take you to Vegas or Atlantic City with me since clearly you’re more willing to gamble and could push me to live a little. LOL

I really like your selections and the rationale behind them are sound. To have any of these books win would be such a coupe. It would really mix things up and open up a new avenue for the Coretta Scott King Awards.

Bring on the winners, ALA!!